Your Excellency Secretary-General Guterres, Your Excellency the High Commissioner for Human Rights, We write to…
The past 18 months have seen unprecedented public unrest over proposed new laws and policies for the Internet that would both undermine its functioning as an open, neutral communications medium, and threaten the human rights of its users. At the national level instruments such as the United States’ SOPA and PIPA, and India’s Internet Intermediary Guidelines, are seen as uninformed and/or unduly influenced by industry lobbyists protecting outdated business models. At the global level, agreements such as the secretively-negotiated ACTA, Trans-Pacific Partnership and International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs), are rightly seen as democratically deficient and therefore illegitimate in light of norms of multi-stakeholder participation to which governments pay lip service.
At the same time, civil society has also recently been at the nexus of a flourishing of interest in a positive agenda for Internet governance, such as the development of broad statements of shared principles (including the Declaration of Internet Freedom), ad hocnetworks for engagement on current policy processes (such as the ITU’s World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) at which the ITRs are being renegotiated), and new institutional innovations that could channel public interest inputs into policy development processes either in a reactive (eg. the Internet Defence League) or a proactive (eg. the Enhanced Cooperation Task Force) fashion.
Some of these civil society initiatives are so new that those leading them have not yet had time to adequately allow for the input of other NGOs who may have a long background working on ICT issues in their own countries, with important perspectives to contribute. In fact there is much scope for all of the NGOs working on Internet governance issues, from North and South alike, to gain valuable practical knowledge from each other. In advance of the upcoming meetings of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and the ITU’s WCIT, we have an important opportunity to share such knowledge, to deliberate on issues of difference, and to produce tangible outputs to further objectives that we share.
Internet governance history and review
The ITU and the International Telecommunications Regulations
Lunch and networking break
Drafting a civil society statement to WCIT
Declarations of Internet rights and Internet governance principles
Process towards enhanced cooperation on Internet public policy issues
Lunch and networking break
Drafting civil society IG principles for the IGF
Next steps
The background papers for the meeting can be viewed on a separate page. For future meetings, the list will be contained on a tab like this one.
“We call on the IGF to develop an IGF-level multistakeholder statement on Internet governance, drawing on existing statements of rights and principles developed by various stakeholders, for presentation to the 2013 meeting of the IGF in Indonesia.
In recent times civil society groups have found themselves on the defensive in internet policy debates. The WSIS plus 10 process is a chance to explore contrasting views from the global south as to what kind of web we want – not just those already online but those still to come online. This session is targeted at those who wish to understand the needs and objectives of groups in the global south and the expected outcome sis a clearer understanding of a positive policy agenda.
Names of the organizer(s) of the workshop and their affiliation to various stakeholder groups:
Andrew Puddephatt, Director, Global partners; co-convener of “Best Bits” network; affiliated to the Internet Rights and Principles coalition at the IGF, based in the UK www.global-partners.co.uk
Names and affiliations of the panelists and the remote moderator:
Panelists:
Contact person:
Name: Andrew Puddephatt
Organization: Global Partners
E-mail: [email protected]
In a year when the confidence of Internet users in the Internet governance status quo was shattered by revelations of systematic and indiscriminate governance surveillance, there is a greater need than ever before for civil society organisations engaged on Internet governance and Internet rights freedom issues to come together to share and strategise. The 2013 meeting of the Best Bits network will address key issues at the intersection of Internet policy and human rights, for direct application over the next twelve months.
Through the shared outputs of this meeting and the indirect benefits of participation, we expect to empower civil society organisations and individual activists to create more informed, effective, inclusive and complementary advocacy outcomes, in which the public interest is better reflected in high-level policy discussions and in the outputs that these discussions produce. The meeting will also place Best Bits itself on a firmer institutional footing, in order to enhance its legitimacy as a broad-based civil society advocacy network and improve its long-term sustainability.
Welcome, introductions, logistics, and meeting opening
Global Internet governance principles, enhanced cooperation and the IGF
Facilitators: Parminder Jeet Singh and Joy Liddicoat, background documents
If required, divide into groups of 3 and then report back.
Lunch and networking break
The ITU, the WSIS+10 process and other IG-related spaces
Facilitators: Joana Varon Ferraz and Matthew Shears, background documents
Output: Set of draft recommendations based on the following questions:
Output Setting up of task forces (as necessary) with the aim of building appropriate engagement roadmaps.
State surveillance and human rights
Facilitators: Andrew Puddephatt and Deborah Brown, background documents
Potential output from group 1: A list of important upcoming standards discussions and RFCs; sketch out a timeline of more technical meetings where these issues can/should be discussed.
Potential output from group 2: A concrete requests for the private sector- internet companies and telcos- that would outline what actions from corporations civil society would like to see in light of surveillance revelations
Potential output from group 3: Outcome might be a series of action points/ a working group/ a short statement aimed at IGF and potentially other bodies. We will have to take our cue on this one from the previous day, whether it looks like people want to focus on Brazil2014, IGF, a broader statement that can be repurposed, etc.
Lunch and networking break
Best Bits
Facilitator: Jeremy Malcolm and Anja Kovacs, background documents
Output: Agreed statement of objectives.
Output: Procedure wiki.
Joint Best Bits/Web We Want dinner at Nusa Dua Beach Grill (own cost of IDR 200.000, transport provided)
[participants event=”81910″]
[backgroundpapers event=”81910″]
[eventreports event=”81910″]
Best Bits participants gathered in Bali agreed on these basic principles that should guide the development of a planned Rio summit on Internet governance:
Well-funded and well organized interest groups from within the technical and business communities will be advancing their agendas at the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance, with the intent of securing outcomes that favour their perceived interests. Civil society’s responsibility is to ensure that these outcomes do not conflict with the broader, long-term public interest. Our challenge is therefore to be equally well organised as the other stakeholder representatives, even though we do not enjoy the same funding and staffing resources that they do.
This meeting is a joint initiative of
Registration is now closed.
The “CS pre-NM” is a gathering of over 90 civil society groups from around the world involved in internet governance and broader internet-related public policy debates regionally and globally. This is an action-oriented group with the aim to facilitate the expression of civil society views and feed them into the discussions at NETmundial and beyond.
The agenda is focused on setting points of consensus, discussing strategic action and distilling key messages for members of civil society that are able to pursue common goals, based on 1) defending fundamental Human Rights; 2) ensuring the Open, Decentralized and Interoperable Architecture of the Web and 3) fostering an Open, Inclusive, Democratic and Decentralised Multistakeholder model of Internet Governance.
Based on these three pillars, in order to have a clear mapping of the state of consensus within Civil Society, we are convening 3 working groups (Principles, Roadmap and IANA transition) of resource persons that will be focused until the day of our meeting on analyzing CS contributions and comments posted at NetMundial platform to deliver: a) a set of bullet points of possible ground of consensus and b) a set of questions around key issues that will require us to have agreement on during our meeting. Our hope is to honor different CS points of view presented so far, and quickly air disagreements and the arguments for each approach.
We hope we can count on your collaboration to achieve our goals and, in the end, have a clear message from civil society that enable those who seek to refine their tactics and strategies for the Conference to do so.
Welcome coffee
NETmundial 2014 introduction and Goal of our meeting
Principles: Guaranteeing protection of Human Rights and Ensuring the Open and Interoperable Architecture of the Web
Break
Roadmap: towards a coordinated, decentralized, inclusive and open multistakeholder model of Internet Governance
Lunch
NetMundial: The rules of the game: how to maximize civil society impact in the interventions and the meetings to follow
Transfer to venue: Upstairs Lounge, 2nd floor (next to restaurants), Grand Hyatt São Paulo, Av. das Nações Unidas, 13301, São Paulo – SP (transport provided [TBC])
Open session with technical community
Meeting with invited governments (bilateral or mixed – TBC)
[backgroundpapers event=”94489″]
[eventreports event=”94489″]
Registration
Welcome and introductions (moderation: Andrew)
Highlights and tactics for IGF (moderation: Nnenna)
Policy slam – people have 10 min to present or discuss something they find relevant
Lunch and networking break
Follow-up to WSIS+10 and tactics moving forward (moderation: Deborah + Anja)
Best Bits way forward
To add a background paper, click the Upload button above. [backgroundpapers event=”134671″]
To add a report, click the Upload button above. [eventreports event=”134671″]
We call for the establishment of the IGF as a multistakeholder forum within the framework of the United Nations with an open-ended mandate, that should be reformed and strengthened.
See also this statement which grew out of discussions at the meeting and is endorsed by a subset of participants.
On Monday, March 2, in Paris, a group of civil society organisations including Global Partners Digital (GPD), Association for Progressive Communications (APC), Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), Internet Democracy Project, KICTANet, Centre for Communication Governance at National Law University Delhi, and the Internet Rights and Principles (IRP) Coalition – in collaboration with the Internet Society (ISOC) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) – will be holding a 1-day event focused on the WSIS+10 Overall Review.
For more information about the WSIS review and why it matters, follow this link. The purpose of the event is to raise awareness of the review process and to facilitate coordination and strategy development for effective civil society engagement. Part of the event will be dedicated to facilitating cross-community dialogue with representatives from the technical community, the business sector and governments.
A rough agenda for the day is as follows:
Time | Session |
09:00-12:00 | Civil society awareness raising and coordination session 1 |
12:00-13:00 | Lunch |
13:00-14:00 | Cross-community session 1: Setting the scene for the WSIS process in 2015: what is at stake?* |
14:00-15:00 | Cross-community session 2: Sharing strategies and finding synergies* |
15:00-15:30 | Break |
15:30-17:30 | Civil society awareness raising and coordination session 2 |
A detailed agenda for the civil society sessions as well as info on speakers for the cross-community sessions will be shared closer to the date. The event will be held on the margins of UNESCO’s CONNECTing the Dots conference.
To participate remotely at the cross-community sessions, please follow this link: http://www.
[participants event=”157964″]
[backgroundpapers event=”157964″]
A meeting to facilitate civil society engagement in the WSIS+10 Review process is being held on October 14 and 15 (Wednesday-Thursday) in New York, USA. The meeting is being organized by Global Partners Digital (GPD), in collaboration with the Association for Progressive Communications (APC), Access Now, Bytes for All, the Centre for Communication Governance at the National Law University in Delhi, Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), Coding Rights, FGV/ CTS, Internet Democracy Project, Just Net Coalition (JNC), KICTANet, and Public Knowledge, with support of the government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the GovLab at NYU.
The aim of the meeting is to facilitate civil society input and engagement in the WSIS+10 Review process. The WSIS process has been a unique vehicle in promoting a development-oriented, human rights respecting information society, recognizing the important role played by all stakeholders in its governance. This year, as WSIS marks its 10th anniversary, the UN General Assembly is set to evaluate its progress and decide its future. In order for the WSIS to continue acting as a conduit for ICT4D underpinned by human rights beyond 2015, it is important that views of all stakeholders especially those from developing countries, are reflected in its outcomes. In order to contribute towards this goal, the objective of this meeting is to further coordinate global civil society priorities, input and engagement in the Review process. The two-day meeting will take place in the run-up to the deadline for submissions on the zero-draft of the Review outcome document (October 15th) as well as the informal interactive WSIS stakeholder consultations on October 19th.
The Expression of Interest form is now closed. Thank you to all those who applied. We look forward to seeing many of you in New York. If you are unable to join us, please follow the meeting remotely. Information and links to follow the meeting can be found on the “Remote Participation” tab in the middle of this page and below.
Time |
Agenda item |
Set-up |
Remote ptcptn? |
Wednesday, October 14 |
|||
09:00-09:15 |
Run-through of agenda and meeting objectives |
Plenary |
YES |
09:15-09:30 |
Participant introductions |
Plenary |
YES |
09:30-09:45 |
WSIS Review status check |
Plenary |
YES |
10:15-10:25 |
Coffee |
||
10:25-13:00 |
Developing shared priorities |
Plenary/breakout groups |
TBC |
13:00-14:00 |
Lunch |
||
14:00-17:00 |
Developing key messages on zero-draft |
Plenary/breakout groups |
TBC |
Thursday, October 15 |
|||
09:00-09:30 |
Day 1 Recap |
Plenary |
YES |
09:30-10:30 |
Developing joint strategies 1 |
Plenary/breakout groups |
TBC |
10:30-10:45 |
Coffee |
||
10:45-12:00 |
Developing joint strategies 2 |
Plenary |
TBC |
12:00-13:00 |
Lunch |
||
13:00-17:00 |
Option 1: Continue working on key messages |
TBC |
|
Option 2: Groups work on own submissions |
no |
||
Option 3: Meeting NY mission representatives |
no |
Name | Affiliation | Country | |
1 | Ahmed M. M. Eisa | Gedaref Digital City Organization | Sudan |
2 | Alimi O. Adamu | Media Rights Agenda (MRA) | Nigeria |
3 | Amalia Toledo | Fundación Karisma | Colombia |
4 | Andrew Puddephatt | Global Partners Digital | UK |
5 | Anja Kovacs | Internet Democracy Project | India |
6 | Antonio Martínez | Horizontal | Mexico |
7 | Carolina Rossini | Public Knowledge | Brazil |
8 | Charles Bradley | Global Partners Digital | UK |
9 | Chinmayi Arun | National Law University Delhi | India |
10 | Coppens Pasteur NDAYIRAGIJE | BurundiX ASBL | Burundi |
11 | Danae Tapia | Derechos Digitales | Chile |
12 | Daniela Schnidrig | CELE – Center for Studies on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information | Argentina |
13 | Deborah Brown | APC – Association for Progressive Communications | US |
14 | Deji Olukotun | Access Now | US |
15 | Donny B.U | ICT Watch – Indonesia | Indonesia |
16 | Evelien Wijsktra | Ministry of Foreign Affairs | The Netherlands |
17 | Gene Kimmelman | Public Knowledge | US |
18 | Grace Githaiga | Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) | Kenya |
19 | Joana Varon | Coding Rights | Brazil |
20 | Juliet Nanfuka Nakiyini | CIPESA – Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa | Uganda |
21 | Jyoti Panday | Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) | India |
22 | Lea Kaspar | Global Partners Digital | Croatia |
23 | Luca Belli | Center for Technology & Society at Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
24 | Margareth Kang | DHITECH | Brazil |
25 | Maricarmen Sequera | TEDIC NGO | Paraguay |
26 | Matthew Shears | Center for Democracy & Technology | UK |
27 | Md Rezaur Rahman | Law Life Culture | Bangladesh |
28 | Michael Baak | Public Knowledge | South Korea |
29 | Miguel Morachimo | NGO Hiperderecho | Peru |
30 | Moses Owiny | WOUGNET – Women of Uganda Network | Uganda |
31 | Olga Balbine Tsafack Nguekeng | PROTEGE QV | Cameroon |
32 | Parminder Jeet Singh | IT for Change and Just Net Coalition | India |
33 | Peter Micek | Access Now | US |
34 | Puneeth Nagaraj | Centre for Communication Governance | India |
35 | Reza Salim | BFES – Bangladesh Friendship Education Society | Bangladesh |
36 | Rishab Bailey | Society for Knowledge Commons | India |
37 | Samantha Dickinson | Lingua Synaptica | Australia |
38 | Shahzad Ahmad | Civil Society Organization | Pakistan |
39 | Sheetal Kumar | Global Partners Digital | UK |
40 | Shita Laksmi | Hivos Southeast Asia | Indonesia |
41 | Stefaan Verhulst | NYU GovLab | Belgium |
42 | Valeria Betancourt | Association for Progressive Communications | Ecuador |
43 | Victor Kapiyo | ICJ Kenya / KICTANet | Kenya |
To join the meeting online, please click on the correct date and link below. There is a unique link for each day of the meeting. Follow the on-screen instructions to set up the call, including your name and email address. Once the webex window has loaded, please click “call using computer” to connect your audio.
The diversity of Internet governance issues and processes creates a ongoing challenge for civil society groups to keep up and to effectively engage. This meeting offers the opportunity to review the landscape, and to dive deep into a few selected key areas. Amongst the highlights of 2015 have been the IANA transition, the ongoing WSIS+10 preparations, rulemaking on net neutrality in both the United States and Europe, and the progress of trade agreements that will impact on the Internet issues. Meanwhile, concerns over state surveillance still occupy as much concern as in previous years. Alongside these substantive concerns, the institutional landscape of Internet governance continues to evolve, including the first meetings of the NETmundial Initiative, and new experimentation with outputs at the Internet Governance Forum this year. Participants at the Best Bits 2015 meeting will share knowledge of recent developments, broaden their understanding of existing initiatives in this space, and collaborate on the development of shared principles and strategies to advance the use of transparent, participatory processes in the development of Internet policies.
Registration
Welcome, logistics and opening
Policy slam and introductions
Part of what Best Bits does is identify issues of common concern and allow small working groups to form. This informal session will get everyone talking and explaining what their organisation’s main concerns are so that people can then hook up informally over lunch if they are interested in that issue.
Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in Internet governance
Just as the so-called multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance has attained broad acceptance, it has also begun to attract criticism for how elastic that term is, extending to processes that at best offer limited opportunity for meaningful stakeholder inclusion, and at worst may be a front for corporate self-regulation or government policy whitewashing. There is an apparent need for a set of criteria to distinguish these deficient processes from those that truly do promote policy-making that includes the perspectives of all affected stakeholders. This session will discuss such a set of criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in Internet governance.
WSIS+10 update
An update on the WSIS process and its significance, and an invitation to those who are interested to go into more detail to come to a follow-up deep dive event on Monday.
Overview of active global venues discussing Internet public policy issues
This session will provide a survey of some well-known and some lesser-known global or multi-regional institutions and policy processes where Internet rules are being shaped. These are as diverse as technical bodies such as ICANN, human rights bodies such as the Human Right Council, trade negotiations such as the TPP, TISA and TTIP, intergovernmental venues such as OECD, ITU, UNCTAD, UN GGE, UNGA and GCCS, and hybrids such as the NETmundial Initiative and Freedom Online Coalition.
Catalyzing reform of trade negotiation processes
The aim of this session is to generate actionable strategies for reclaiming Internet-related public policy development from closed, captured trade negotiation processes. Strategies to be considered may involve catalyzing reforms to the procedural norms of multilateral trade negotiations, and/or redirecting Internet-related policy discussions away from trade negotiations to more open and inclusive fora.
Best Bits way forward
Since the first meeting, Best Bits has always been in finding a balance between loosely or tightly institutionalised. This session will review the 2014 annual report, being our first full year with an elected steering committee. We will then present the results of an attempted election for new steering committee, and questionnaire results following from that aborted election, suggesting that we should revert back to a looser voluntary restructure. The session will conclude with discussion of the transition from a formal steering committee structure back to voluntary ordering. Also to be discussed: representation on and leadership of the Civil Society Internet Governance Coordination Group.
To add a background paper, click the Upload button above. [backgroundpapers event=”165728″]
To add a report, click the Upload button above. [eventreports event=”165728″]
A set of Idea Rating Sheets were produced, with ideas for reforming closed trade negotiation processes in which Internet public policy issues are being determined, in conflict with multi-stakeholder process norms.
Befitting the broader ownership of this year’s meeting, its overall theme is Civil Society’s Role in Internet Governance. The detailed session agenda may be viewed by clicking the “Agenda” tab above.
Registration
Welcome and introductions
Priorities and tactics for civil society at IGF 2016
IG and democracy – people’s participation and movements
Internet governance was initially mostly about Internet’s technical governance, with issues related to ICANN and ITU central to it. But as Internet and its associated digital technologies are today universally recognised as a potent social phenomenon, transforming almost all sectors of the society, IG needs to shift more towards social, economic and cultural policies. This requires a corresponding shift in the actors that are the focus of IG. Technical actors led governance is no longer appropriate (which, in any case, under the garb of technocracy, is often corporate led governance). We need to put people, and therefore democracy, at the centre of IG. This group will explore how this can be achieved, and how people’s participation and peoples/ social movements can be made central to civil society IG discourses.
Shadow regulation and multi-stakeholder process criteria
Shadow Regulation is EFF’s name for voluntary agreements between companies (sometimes described as codes, principles, standards, or guidelines) to regulate your use of the Internet, often without your knowledge. Users aren’t consulted during their development, don’t know how they are being applied, and typically have little or no means of recourse when they are used to shut down our speech online. Jeremy Malcolm will explain how this concept ties in with the multi-stakeholder model, and Emma Llanso will give some case studies.
Trade and the Internet
A short presentation by Burcu Kilic about the four trade-related sessions at the IGF will be followed by a concise summary by Jeremy Malcolm of what policy issues are at stake and where (including trade agreements and the WTO). This will lead into a discussion about what substantive recommendations on Internet policy issues discussed in the context of trade would we want to send from the IGF led by Maryant Fernandez. We will then move into discussion of what we should do collectively to push for more openness and transparency in trade negotiations led by Marília Maciel. Finally we will consider whether there should be a dynamic coalition on Internet and trade and/or on trade transparency/openness, and close with open discussion and questions.
African regional session
What topics and bodies is CS covering, and what not – strategies for 2016-2018
Civil society engagement and collaborations on Internet issues has become more efficient and coordinated over the years. The challenges are still, but also moving and changing. Where do we need to be and how can we organize to ensure we are ready for the coming years? We’ll do a mapping of ‘what are relevant fora’, ‘who is where’ and ‘who will work on what’. Let’s shape our future agenda, tactics and strategies together.
Regional Engagement in Internet Governance – The role of LAC and developing countries
Domain Name Policy Matters: Advancing noncommercial values at ICANN
In this session we want to challenge the impression that focusing on domain name policies as a critical Internet-related topic is not exciting or important for civil society activists. It is important, it is often interesting and rewarding. We want to bring your attention to the impact we make as noncommercial users and civil society activists in the noncommercial users constituency at ICANN. Focusing on domain name related issues is not only about some of the often complicated and specific subjects of new gTLDs, WHOIS and many other ICANN acronyms, it is also an opportunity to practice what we have always preached: multistakeholder governance. We will discuss what we have done with regards to human rights, freedom of expression, privacy at ICANN, how we help evolve ICANN’s multistakeholder process and governance, why we need your help and expertise and how and why you should join us.
Open time for questions, discussion, and policy slam
To add a background paper, click the Upload button above. [backgroundpapers event=”197688″]
To add a report, click the Upload button above. [eventreports event=”197688″]
To be confirmed.
Joint organizers of this meeting are the Association for Progressive Communications (APC), Best Bits, the Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (IGC), the Just Net Coalition (JNC), and ICANN’s Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG). The meeting is hosted by courtesy of Diplo Foundation and the Geneva Internet Project.
The overall theme for this meeting is Private Regulation of the Internet. The detailed session agenda (which is subject to change) may be found under the “Latest agenda” tab.
Registration
Welcome and introductions
Private regulation of the Internet
Regional issues
Trade and the Internet
Privacy and economic value of data
Flash/policy slam sessions
NCUC/NCSG presentation
Civil society strategy session
To add a background paper, click the Upload button above. [backgroundpapers event=”1751991″]
To add a report, click the Upload button above. [eventreports event=”1751991″]
To be confirmed.
There are no upcoming events.
Your Excellency Secretary-General Guterres, Your Excellency the High Commissioner for Human Rights, We write to…
To the outgoing and incoming Executive Committees of the ICDPPC Hong Kong – Ahead of…
We, the people in the Amazon, would like you to stop talking about us without…
Over the last year, the public imagination has continued to be seized with the concept…
Dear organizers, In light of the scheduled “Retreat on Advancing the 10-Year Mandate of the…
Best Bits was a global civil society network on the topic of Internet governance, that was formed in 2012 and closed in 2019. Many of the former members of Best Bits participate in the Internet Governance Caucus.